Mental Anguish
Thoughts that will drive you to tears















Ahead of the Potomac Primaries

Posted by Seth Kramer on Monday, February 11th 2008 at 11:46pm

blogpicture


Tuesday marks the Potomac primaries: Virginia, Maryland, and DC all vote. Polls indicate Obama is leading in each of them. That coupled with the fact that he's won Nebraska, Washington, Louisiana, the Virgin Islands, and Maine all by sizable margins means he's leading in pledged delegates, and catching up on Clinton's previous lead in pledged + super delegates. If he takes Hawai'i, as he is expected to do, and Wisconsin (which Clinton considers competitive--although she thought Maine was competitive too, and Obama has the support of their Governor) that would deal a serious blow to camp Clinton. Their firewall as of now is Ohio and Texas. Chock-a-block with blue collar Dems, and Latinos, Clinton's bread and butter, the only way she stays competitive is to run up the score in those two states, that of course assumes she isn't steamrolled by the momentum of a 10-in-a-row victory by Obama. It should be noted that the Texas and Ohio primaries are 22 days away; a lifetime in politics, and as long as Obama's winning, her news dries up.

Clinton's campaign manager stepped down the other day. She was not fired, she stepped down. This serves two purposes, it gives Clinton's campaign a fresh approach from someone else, and it buys her time. She can simply respond to the upcoming Obama victories by saying, "Well, you know, he was expected to win, and we're retooling our campaign right now, you have to expect that while the new campaign manager is learning the ropes..."

Another issue hanging in the air is an Edwards endorsement. Both camps are meeting with Edwards about a possible endorsement deal. I've said it before and I'll say it again. I really can't see Edwards endorsing Clinton. Stranger things have happened, but the issues he flogged like a rented mule ("daddy and his miiiiiill", corporate influence in politics, lobbyists and Political Action Committees, etc) are par for the course with the Clintons--witness HillPAC. The only thing she's got going for her is her health care package, which was virtually identical to Edwards'.

Another interesting turn of events is Huckabee's potential lawsuit over the Washington caucus. Apparently, down by 242 votes, the state party decided to stop counting the remaining 1500 votes. There is significant backlash in the GOP against McCain, and it would seem that Huckabee is the benefactor. He's probably officially reached the "pissing us off" stage with the McCain campaign. Now it's more about building a movement for the 2012 elections (yeah, it's already started people.)

There are also mumblings about the veepstakes. As each Huckabee success weakens McCain it's going to decrease the likelihood of a Huckabee Veep. Though McCain vehemently denies he would pick a running mate for geographic reasons, there is some talk about the Republican Governor of Florida, Charlie Crist. He's popular, he's from a purple state, a little ethnic (Greek Cypriot), and as we've come to expect from a Republican, there have been rumors of homosexuality for quite some time. This would definitely make Coulter blow her top, but it could be a smart move. It would force the Dems to pick someone from Ohio or Pennsylvania to secure another corresponding block of purple state voters. Plus it could risk that Obama's voters wouldn't back Clinton without Obama on the ticket, or that Clinton's voters might not support Obama without Clinton on the ticket. Brilliantly divisive (a la Rove), but that doesn't strike me as McCain's style. But that's just one man's opinion about one possible running mate.

Strategies for Obama

(Rove type strategy) DIVISIVE! Beat down Clinton's superdelegates talk by pointing out she's hoping to win the contest based upon a bunch of party insiders that likely got there thanks to her husband. If the nomination comes down to superdelegates, this is would be the nuclear option. It's preemptively striking at a weak spot in the primary system. The superdelegates are there for two reasons, (1) avoid a floor fight by picking a winner, (2) prevent the activists who vote in the primaries from picking a candidate too far outside the mainstream to get elected. Number 1 is all we're really concerned about here. If he did this it would be the 1968 Democratic convention all over again.

Stick in the knife! First conquer, Wisconsin. It's the only "Clinton state where the expectations are low. Sink a bunch of people and money into Wisconsin and win. Then focus on Ohio. It's probably the easiest state for Obama to win out of Ohio and Texas. There are large black populations in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus, Toledo, and Dayton. There is a large student population, and there's a minuscule Latino population, a group he's had little success with. To keep Clinton from running up the score send Ted Kennedy down to Texas to talk to the Latinos, and hammer the final nail in her coffin. Without one of these two states she's toast. Her "pledged" delegates start running for the doors as Obama locks down the nomination. Of course, as I said earlier, that's 22 days away so anything could happen.

Point out the disaster that Clinton would be to down-ticket races. If Dems want to win some of the 22 Republican Senate seats up for grabs this year, and more of the Republican House seats, Clinton puts those in jeopardy, by unifying the Republicans who are already pretty bummed about McCain being their nominee.

Strategies for Clinton

Play the expectations game. Set the bar so low you're likely to trip over it, and no victory of Obama's should be recognized. Well of course Obama won the South, he has tremendous support in the black community. And red states don't matter because they weren't going to vote for us anyway, and caucuses don't matter because they're not primaries, and small states don't matter because they're not big states, etc. Raise or donate enough money to win something, anything (Wisconsin, Rhode Island, Virginia--okay that ships probably sailed but the first two may be competitive) just stop the bleeding.

Don't talk about how you're "the best candidate to take on McCain in the fall." Every poll has Obama beating McCain by about 5 points more than you. Find some other talking point

Last thought

Clinton's pledged delegate total: 924
Obama's pledged delegate total: 986
Pledged Delegates still up for grabs in primaries: 1250 (including Guam, Democrats Abroad, Puerto Rico, and Washington DC)

Given the proportional nature of the Democratic races, the likelihood that either of them gets the 1100 or 1050 necessary to win the nomination without the superdelegates, is pretty low. If the super delegates have to decide this thing (and I think they will) and there is no obvious winner (I hope there will be, but I worry there will not be) all hell is going to break loose. We may be approaching time for someone to take running mate as a way to keep the party from damaging itself so much McCain walks away with it. This could be a very scary game of chicken.

It'll be interesting to see how the next 22 days play out.



Comments


The pundits in the know say Texas is more fertile ground than Ohio. Either way it still looks bad for Clinton. She fired the deputy campaign director too. This is the guy who accidentally leaked the memo about how they shouldn't play in Iowa. Whoopsie-doodle.

Seth Kramer [02.12.2008 20:55:21]

As things seemingly begin to boil down in the democratic primary, I can't help but wonder which of them would make the better president. As much as most of us love Obama, will he have the leverage to get things done in the White House? Don't get me wrong, I still support Obama, but the one impression these primaries have left me with is that the Democrats are splitting right down the middle. After the race is over, will the other Democrats fall into line and vote for Obama come November? And if the animosity between the Clintons and Obama still exists post election, Obama will be hard pressed to get any legislation past the senate. I won't extrapolate on behalf of the Clintons. If Obama wins, his heralded message of change will be a long road up a steep cliff.

Ben W. [02.13.2008 01:19:21]

It's a good point. There was some exit polling in Louisiana that seemed to indicate that Clinton supporters were less likely to support Obama, than Obama supporters were to support Clinton. However the wording was pretty ambigious "Is the other candidate 'acceptable'". Well what the hell does that mean?

I would have thought Clinton would have had more difficulty getting Obama voters. I'm judging that based on simply my own position. I can't see myself voting for McCain in the fall, but I know I can't vote for Clinton, for reasons I've already outlined. That said, for as much as the Democrats and Republicans have fought over who the nominee should be, the conventional wisdom is that they'll unite if only for the sake of federal judges.

As much as my gut says Obama's going to get the stuffing knocked out of him by the right wing crazies, Listening to McCain's speech last night made me think how bad McCain's message is. Last night his message boiled down to: "Yeah, I used to have dreams too." A terrible counterpoint to Obama's "Yes, we can" message.

Just a brief recap of McCain's messaging on the campaign trail.

Michigan: You're jobs are gone and they're not coming back.

New Hampshire: Iraq for 100 years

Also New Hampshire: "The issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should. I have Greenspan's book."

Florida: More Wars comin'

I don't know who's running the press shop for McCain but they need to be fired. That or the candidate needs to stop speaking off the cuff. The only reason he doesn't get his ass raked over the coals by the press is because (1) they're lapdogs, and (2) he's a great story for them. If I'm Clinton or Obama. I run one of those clips, fade to black talk about McCain's 24 years in the Senate (with b/w pictures of McCain on the Senate floor 24 years ago) and ask "How's McCain's brand of change been working for ya?" The only other problem McCain has is not looking like a grumpy old man.

I'm just pleased the GOP has finally nominated a candidate that I think they can be proud of. More on that later.

Seth Kramer [02.13.2008 08:43:46]

I forgot to mention the actual results. Per CNN, who has been the most cautious of the news networks in calling races, though their graphics look like they're playing Battleship (TM Milton Bradley)

DC
Obama: 75%
Clinton: 24%

Okay DC is easy given the black population, but that's still a spankin'.

Maryland
Obama: 60%
Clinton 37%

When you're beat by 20+ points. You got your ass handed to you, but the most surprising. The one state she was supposed to do well in...

Virginia
Obama: 64%
Clinton: 35%

This was worse than Maryland. Virginia doesn't have a huge black population. It's not largely highly educated. There are quite a few colleges, but not enough to run up the score to almost 30 points!

This wasn't just a victory. It was a slaughter. This is the kind of victory that makes politicos say, maybe there's some there there. Firing the campaign managers is flailing, and they know it.

They need to get away from this "Experience" narrative. It's clearly not working. Obama has been treating the elephant in the room--the Clinton integrity questions--with kid gloves. The Republicans won't be so nice.

Seth Kramer [02.13.2008 10:54:54]

Very eloquently put Seth. Loved the elephant in the room observation. :)

Ben W. [02.13.2008 18:19:31]

Obama wins WI by 17 points. His tightest margin since he began his 10 state march. Some are saying Clinton must win either Ohio, or Texas, but I think she has to win both, and by big margins, and lets face it, that isn't going to happen shy of a complete Obama meltdown. It's time to start taking up the tent-pegs. There's always 2012, or 2016--although Dems don't tend to like candidates who run more than once. She could get very ugly, but that's bad for her legacy, and worse for her husband's. We'll see.

Seth Kramer [02.20.2008 09:54:25]

Okay, the punditry may be changing its mind about which is better for Obama Texas or Ohio.

National Journal says it looks like Wisconsin with university students, similar populations, but a much larger black community. Hmmm. Seems like I said something similar some time ago...If only I could find it.

Seth Kramer [02.20.2008 11:26:23]

The Politico is reporting Obama won the Democrats abroad global internet primary (silly I know, but it counts and that makes 11 wins.) It's probably not going to get any press with all the McCain kerfluffle, but in this race every delegate counts.

Seth Kramer [02.21.2008 12:58:00]

I was really hoping Obama could close the deal on the Ohio/Texas Primaries. Once again Ohio may be involved in a royal screw up. Either way this is going to drag on for the next few weeks and the Democrats need a nominee. The Republicans are now in a stronger position since McCain has won the nomination. I'm sure they're more than happy to let the Democrats scratch their heads over who their candidate will be.

Ben W. [03.05.2008 16:28:50]
Name*
Email*
(not displayed)
URL
Comment*
Turing Test*